Taza Aya
  • Home
  • The Problem
  • The Solution
  • Technology
  • Blog & News
  • Team
  • Contact & Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Employment Opportunities

Intro to Non-Thermal Plasma

Non-thermal plasmas (NTPs), are sometimes called “cold flames” because they share many of the properties of fire - including the sterilizing properties. However, unlike flames, NTPs are not hot and do not consume oxygen.

NTPs are formed in the presence of a high electric field gradient, i.e., a substantial difference in voltage between two electrodes that are closely spaced. At very low pressures, well below that of ambient air, plasmas can form stably in various gases.  At standard atmospheric pressure, the same configuration would generate sparks that jump between the electrodes - not what we want.  However, if a dielectric material is situated between the electrodes, then a plasma that covers a much larger volume than a spark can be maintained stably over the surface. 

How Does It Work?

Combustion flames are thermal plasmas that are routinely used for sterilization. Like combustion flames, non-thermal plasmas (NTPs) produce energetic, highly reactive but also short-lived fragments of molecules.  However, unlike combustion flames, NTPs:

Are not hot

Require no fuel

Consume no oxygen

NTPs are quick and effective for reducing airborne pathogens.  Specifically for air that is flowing (such as in ventilation ducts), quick and effective translate to small in size.  This makes NTPs well-suited for miniaturization, such as for use in wearable devices. 

Existing air cleaning technologies can’t compete with the effectiveness, capacity, and compactness of NTPs, including some that are already being used in the fast-growing wearable air purifier market.

How does NTP stack up against  other air cleaning technologies?

Compared to uv light:

  • UV reduced [1] infectious viruses in air by 99%; NTPs by more than 99% [2]
  • NTPs treated air at a rate almost 3 times faster 
  • NTP devices were 3 times smaller

1. Tseng and Li, Aerosol Sci. & Technology 39, 1136 (2005)
2. Xia et al.,  J. of Physics D 52, 255201. (2019)
3. Zhang et al., ASHRAE Journal, August 2020. 

Compared to hepa filters:

  • HEPA filters reduced [3] infectious viruses in air by 97%; NTPs by more than 99% [2]
  • NTPs treated air at a rate 4.5 times faster
  • NTP devices were 44 times smaller
  • NTPs obstructed the flow of air 25% less

Interested in learning more about Taza Aya?

Schedule A Time to Talk Enjoy Our Blog

Contact

Taza Aya
1600 Huron Parkway 2nd floor
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
© 2023 Taza Aya Powered by Jottful